EnneaFoxStart the assessment

Why do I get different Enneagram results?

By EnneaFox editorial teamReviewed

Short answer

Different Enneagram results are common and usually come from four things: your top types were close to begin with, different tests use different questions and scoring, your mood or situation changed how you answered, or you answered as you want to be rather than as you are. Research shows established tests often disagree with each other, so a spread of results is expected, not a failure.

The four usual causes

1. Your top types were close

If your highest two scores were nearly tied, a single answer can flip the order. That is not instability in you; it is a test showing its margin of error.

2. The tests are built differently

Some tests use forced choices between two statements, others ask you to rate each statement. Some ask about behaviors, others about motives. Some have a dozen questions, others over a hundred. Different designs naturally give different answers for people near a boundary.

3. Your state changed

Answering on the morning of a stressful deadline is not the same as answering on a lazy Sunday. Tradition even predicts this: under stress you are said to take on traits of your stress point, so a stressed 2 may answer more like an 8.

4. You answered aspirationally

It is easy to answer as the person you are trying to become. Someone working hard on assertiveness might endorse 8 statements they admire rather than live. Retaking after reading about the types can make this worse, because you start to recognize which answers lead where.

Reading a spread of results

Lay out every result you have received in a simple tally, like this: two results of 6, one of 9, one of 5. Then ask what those types share. Here, all three are associated with withdrawing or caution, and two sit in the head center. That pattern tells you more than any single result. Read the comparison pages for the pairs that keep appearing, starting with the two most frequent.

Patterns in mixed results and what to check
PatternWhat it may meanWhat to read next
Two neighbors, like 4 and 5One may be your wingThe wing pages for both
Two types joined by a line, like 2 and 8One may be a stress or growth pointThe stress and growth page for each
Same center, like 2, 3 and 4Center is clear; type is notThe center page, then pair comparisons
Scattered across centersAnswering style or low self-certaintyA slower retake, focused on motives

Better ways to retake

  • Wait a few weeks between attempts rather than retaking the same day.
  • Answer for your typical life over years, not for this week.
  • When torn, choose the answer that would be true even on a bad day.
  • Use one carefully designed test rather than many short ones.

When the spread is a clue

Occasionally the pattern of results itself is informative. Tradition describes 9s as taking on whatever perspective is in front of them, 6s as doubting their first answer, and 7s as enjoying every option. If you see yourself in one of those descriptions, try reading that type first. Treat this as a hunch to check, not a rule.

What it does not mean

A spread of results does not mean the Enneagram is useless for you, that you have no personality, or that you are answering wrong. It usually means you sit near a boundary between types, which is where a large share of people sit. Use the spread as a reading list, not a verdict on yourself.

Frequently asked questions

Which result should I believe?

None of them on its own. Look for the types that recur and compare their core motives and fears.

Does a different result mean my type changed?

Rarely. Tradition says core type is stable; usually the scores were close or the tests differ.

Why does a short quiz give a different answer than a long test?

Short quizzes have very few items per type, so each answer has a big effect. Longer tests average across more items.

How often should I retake an Enneagram test?

Every few months is plenty. Frequent retakes tend to measure what you have learned about the test rather than about yourself.

Sources

  1. Hook, J. N., Hall, T. W., Davis, D. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Conner, M. (2021). The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 865-883. doi:10.1002/jclp.23097